Why are obama's critics so dumb? Wow.
Anyone who believes obama to be a "sensible, pragmatic centrist" is dumb. Certifiably insane. Lost in space. From a different planet. Ozoning. Dumber than a box of rocks. Stoopid.
Read it here.
And to think that some folks call Ron Paul a kook.
You always have to keep in mind that Liberalism is a mental disorder.
On another subject, Curtis has this excellent post over at his place. Follow and read the links.
Stay safe.
They're trolling conservatives.
ReplyDeleteQuite frankly, that's one of the things I like about Newt. He slaps them down, makes them look drool-worthy stupid while he does it, and then follows up their "follow-up" questions with more of the same.
Nobody destroys the pompous media like Newt. He'd take Andrew Sullivan apart, piece by piece.
Mitt won't. Perry couldn't. Don't know about Santorum, but he's lost the "not Romney" race. And while I like a *lot* about Ron Paul, a lot of the rest is bat-shit crazy.
So I guess I've decided. Wow.
Yep, Newt tells it the way he sees it. Have to respect that. Sounds like he fired up a debate moderator this evening...
ReplyDeleteI haven't read it yet but the headlines are good :)
I remember when Clinton was in the midst of Monicagate and his world was upside down. Newt was the Speaker and the whole world loved him. He could do no wrong. The American people at the time thought he was the clear choice for President...
We're a fickle bunch, eh? :)
And to think that some folks call Ron Paul a kook.
ReplyDeleteYou always have to keep in mind that Liberalism is a mental disorder.
Really.
:)
ReplyDeleteNewsweek? What's a Newsweek? Is that some sore of magazine? Really? You're kidding...
ReplyDeleteFrom PaidContent.org:
"In 2008, Newsweek implemented a circulation rate base reduction at its domestic edition, from 3.1 million to 2.6 million, and in 2009, Newsweek implemented another rate base reduction, to 1.5 million in January 2010.
Newsweek is reducing its domestic rate base to 1.5 million copies in Q1 2010, reflecting a shift in focus to “a different demographic that is closer to its core base of loyal subscribers.” Meaning its core base is shrinking rapidly and so it is too."
And more from adweek.com:
"Using Q1 figures as a guide, the magazine would have made $63 million in print circulation for all of 2010, down from $80 million in 2009. It’s unlikely that’s increased this year, since paid subscriptions, which account for 92 percent of Newsweek’s circulation, declined 8 percent in the first half of 2011, to 1.4 million. "
So all sarcasm aside, who really reads this rag? Well from all the numbers, Hardly anyone.
So, other than the idiot who wrote the story, (and Obummer of course - He's probably got this one framed and hung somewhere...) Who cares what Newsweek says?
JMHO
Joe... "He's probably got this one framed and hung somewhere...)"
ReplyDelete~~ On his bathroom wall... It's where all narcissists go to build their self esteem! :)
China... How you doing, Brother? :)
Newsweak
ReplyDeleteNewsweak... That's good! :)
ReplyDelete