Photo Courtesy of: ahatfulofnapalm.wordpress.com
Neither side wants to change back to "the way it was". Neither side is in favor of individual liberty. They want to control everything. Both sides are progressives. Both sides want to destroy the America that you and I knew growing up. Of course the change was taking place even then, when you and I were children.
I just don't understand what they gain from it? Power and control? When you own the world, what's left? Sit back and watch the little people? All of the "one world order" folks forget about one important element... human nature. You could kill off all the Liberals or all the Conservatives, but the human condition is going to create another Liberal or another Conservative at some point. It's just a matter of time.
The fact remains that a third of the population want to be taken care of. Another third don't know what they want, for sure, but will jump at any opportunity that will benefit them personally in any given situation. The final third just want to be left alone to live their lives and to take care of themselves. The Marxist, one world government fuckers, always seem to forget that.
Joseph Kennedy was Ambassador to England, at the onset of WWII. He was, if not pro-Nazi, Nazi-neutral at best. The Kennedys have run Massachusetts, since the 1930's. Joseph got all of his sons elected to high-ranking public office (John Kennedy was no more qualified to be President than is Obama). Do you really think Romney could become Governor of Massachusetts, without Kennedy family blessings?
Why are there only 2 "major" parties with enough influence to make change in the United States? Why not 3? Or 4? Why can't the Libertarians gain any traction as a major power? The Tea Party? Would they be allowed to exist if thats what the people wanted? Why does no one care?
Why are we constantly fed a stream of lies and bullshit by our government? Why is the media a mouthpiece for the government? Why do a third of the population believe everything that the chocolate jesus feeds them? Why didn't we pay attention when all of this was just beginning to happen?
Why are Liberals more willing than Conservatives to get in your face and scream the talking points that their leaders have taught them? Why do Conservatives respect the rule of law when Liberals do not and are willing to exploit that fact every day? Why are Liberals willing to "do whatever it takes" to promote their agenda while conservatives insist on working within the framework of the law?
What is wrong with a person who wants the government to take care of their every need and to provide a "safety net" for those who will not work? What's wrong with a "free" society where only one half of the people pay for everything that the entire population benefits from? It's really only "free" for the half that are sucking the blood of the payers.
Joseph Kennedy was Ambassador to England, at the onset of WWII. He was, if not pro-Nazi, Nazi-neutral at best. The Kennedys have run Massachusetts, since the 1930's. Joseph got all of his sons elected to high-ranking public office (John Kennedy was no more qualified to be President than is Obama). Do you really think Romney could become Governor of Massachusetts, without Kennedy family blessings?
Why are there only 2 "major" parties with enough influence to make change in the United States? Why not 3? Or 4? Why can't the Libertarians gain any traction as a major power? The Tea Party? Would they be allowed to exist if thats what the people wanted? Why does no one care?
Why are we constantly fed a stream of lies and bullshit by our government? Why is the media a mouthpiece for the government? Why do a third of the population believe everything that the chocolate jesus feeds them? Why didn't we pay attention when all of this was just beginning to happen?
Why are Liberals more willing than Conservatives to get in your face and scream the talking points that their leaders have taught them? Why do Conservatives respect the rule of law when Liberals do not and are willing to exploit that fact every day? Why are Liberals willing to "do whatever it takes" to promote their agenda while conservatives insist on working within the framework of the law?
What is wrong with a person who wants the government to take care of their every need and to provide a "safety net" for those who will not work? What's wrong with a "free" society where only one half of the people pay for everything that the entire population benefits from? It's really only "free" for the half that are sucking the blood of the payers.
In my opinion, governments do not work. Never have. Never will.
obama is obviously not a natural born citizen in accordance with The Constitution and precedent based on The Constitution and is therefore not eligible to be president.
Holder and Justice are obviously involved in Fast and Furious but are getting a pass (how could obama not be involved?). Janet the First had Waco and Ruby Ridge, not to mention Oklahoma City. She, along with Clinton, got a pass. Why? Ruby Ridge and Waco were cases where our government willfully murdered American citizens. No repurcussions. How is that even possible?
Cops are killing citizens without provocation in this country everyday. What's being done about it? They are getting a pass. No one even questions it.
We know that our government is corrupt. We know that our way of life is being dismantled, piece by piece. We know that it is being done intentionally, according to a plan. We know that it's our government that is racist and feeds the fires of racism. They need that racism to stay in power... We know these things, yet we cannot prove them. The rules of evidence change to protect the evil-doers who are charged with crime and corruption. Yet we know these things are true. We know because our gut tells us it is so.
What are we going to do about it? Hope that our jailers are kind to us?
Stay safe.
obama is obviously not a natural born citizen in accordance with The Constitution and precedent based on The Constitution and is therefore not eligible to be president.
Holder and Justice are obviously involved in Fast and Furious but are getting a pass (how could obama not be involved?). Janet the First had Waco and Ruby Ridge, not to mention Oklahoma City. She, along with Clinton, got a pass. Why? Ruby Ridge and Waco were cases where our government willfully murdered American citizens. No repurcussions. How is that even possible?
Cops are killing citizens without provocation in this country everyday. What's being done about it? They are getting a pass. No one even questions it.
We know that our government is corrupt. We know that our way of life is being dismantled, piece by piece. We know that it is being done intentionally, according to a plan. We know that it's our government that is racist and feeds the fires of racism. They need that racism to stay in power... We know these things, yet we cannot prove them. The rules of evidence change to protect the evil-doers who are charged with crime and corruption. Yet we know these things are true. We know because our gut tells us it is so.
What are we going to do about it? Hope that our jailers are kind to us?
Stay safe.
What do they gain? What they aspire to is more horrific than any human mind can comfortably imagine:
ReplyDeleteThen she saw the answer; she saw the secret premise behind their words. With all of their noisy devotion to the age of science, their hysterically technological jargon, their cyclotrons, their sound rays, these men were moved forward, not by the image of an industrial skyline, but by the vision of that form of existence which the industrialists had swept away – the vision of a fat, unhygienic Rajah of India, with vacant eyes staring in indolent stupor out of stagnant layers of flesh, with nothing to do but run previous gems through his fingers and, once in a while, stick a knife into the body of a starved, toil-dazed, germ-eaten creature, as a claim to a few grains of the creature’s rice, then claim it from hundreds of millions of such creatures and thus let the rice grains gather into gems.
That's what they want. Pure evil of a sort that makes you feel unclean just reading about it. I need to bathe in Lysol now. :(
Damn Blue you read my mind Brother no shit! Those are the same thoughts that go through my head everyday.
ReplyDeleteChina
III
Rand, like Orwell, were blessed (or cursed) with an accurate vision of the future. Unfortunately, that future is now.
ReplyDeleteEyes wide open, China.
ReplyDeleteOf course the change was taking place even then, when you and I were children.
ReplyDeleteGood point, because looking back, there wasn't a remote hint.
I just don't understand why people want to control others. It is anathema to me and I don't think this is going to turn out well.
Brock, not wanting to control others just means you have more integrity than 70% of the population in America. Salute!
ReplyDeleteYeah, it probably won't turn out well, but there's only so much that can be done to influence that. So all bets are off now, because of their position, I'd guess the opening gambit will happen in 2 to 3 months.
Stay ready.
Grog
III
70% of the population
ReplyDeleteBy coincidence, (I guess?) I read today that 70% of the population has a favorable opinion of him even though much less approve of his job. Now that's scary. Braindead.
lol, that's a total coincidence, Brock, I didn't know of that. I chose that number because of general observation and because too many people give more credibility to image over substance. As you said, braindead.
ReplyDeleteThat reminds me of an amusing quote I read some years ago in Cooper's Corner. It went something like, "my grandmother was in the hospital, her heart was still beating, but her brain had no activity. It was the first time there was a democrat in the family."
Grog
III
It was the first time there was a democrat in the family."
ReplyDelete:)