"If he had fewer bullets maybe I could get away..."

~~~~~~

Reduced capacity magazines. Hmmmm... Mr. Jones, how far do you think you'd be able to run on your way to "safety" while even an average shooter replaced an empty magazine with a full one? 1 1/2 steps? 2 steps?

The problem, as has been said millions of times, isn't with the lawful gun owner. The lawful gun owner isn't going to shoot you unless you have done something to threaten him, even if he has a kazillion round magazine.

The criminal is the problem. Always has been.  By definition, criminals do not obey the law. Pretty simple concept to understand if you'll just open your mind and stop pushing your agenda.  If you take "large (read: standard) capacity magazines" away from law abiding citizens, the criminals, the people who would do you harm, will still have them.  They will still use them to do you harm.  And the cops will still have them, of course.

Sadly, a very large number of Americans fall for this kind of crap.  People like Van Jones and John Morse clearly understand the emotions of the under-informed or totally ignorant American voter.  They play on those emotions.  They are very good at it.

ALL gun control proposals in this country have a single goal in mind.  The Communists in America want total control.  TOTAL CONTROL.  They can't turn America into their desired Socialist Workers Paradise as long as American citizens are armed. Every little bit that they chip away at gun rights gets them that much closer to their goal.  They have been very patient.  We need to fight every single gun restriction that is proposed at any place or any time in this country.  Every. single. one.  The future of the America that we know and desire depends on it.