"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." ~~Thomas Jefferson

"Who will protect us from those who protect us?"

Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. ~ Thomas Jefferson

"None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free." ~~Goethe

02 June 2017

Suicide pact...

Liberal ideology conceives of “safe spaces” in the context of alleged white patriarchy, but there was a real need for a “safe space” in Britain’s Manchester Arena on May 22, when 22-year-old terrorist Salman Abedi detonated his nail- and screw-filled suicide bomb after a concert by teen idol Ariana Grande. What was the “progressive” answer to yet another instance of Islamic terrorism in the West? Feckless calls for resisting hate, pledges of renewed diversity, and little else.

A rethinking of immigration policies is off the table. Nothing that an Islamic terrorist can do will ever shake the left-wing commitment to open borders—not mass sexual assaults, not the deliberate slaughter of gays, and not, as in Manchester last week, the killing of young girls. The real threat that radical Islam poses to feminism and gay rights must be disregarded in order to transform the West by Third World immigration. Defenders of the open-borders status quo inevitably claim that if a terrorist is a second-generation immigrant, like Abedi, immigration policy has nothing to do with his attack. (Abedi’s parents emigrated to Britain from Libya; his immediate family in Manchester lived in the world’s largest Libyan enclave outside Africa itself.) Media Matters ridiculed a comment about the Manchester bombing by Fox News host Ainsley Earhardt with the following headline: fox news host suggests ‘open borders’ are to blame for manchester attack carried out by british native.

Earhardt had asked how to prevent “what’s happening in Europe, with all these open borders, they’re not vetting, they’re opening their borders to families like this, and this is how they’re paid back in return.” Pace Media Matters, a second-generation Muslim immigrant with a zeal for suicide bombing is as much of an immigration issue as a first-generation immigrant with a terrorist bent. The fact that second-generation immigrants are not assimilating into Western culture makes immigration policy more, not less, of a pressing matter. It is absurd to suggest that Abedi picked up his terrorist leanings from reading William Shakespeare and William Wordsworth, rather than from the ideology of radical Islam that has been imported into Britain by mass immigration.

Read the rest here...


1 comment:

MADDOG63 said...

I have written my State Senator about proposing a bill for a "Federal Sponsorship Program". It won't get off the intern's desk, but I at least vented. BLUF: Instead of openly banning illegals, muslims, refugees, whatever; the gov't starts with a voluntary sponsorship program where anyone who volunteers to be PERSONALLY responsible for one of those above mentioned and has that individual (with family) live in their home or neighborhood, will receive a "reward". When they sponsor their "poor and oppressed" member, they will receive $1000 a month per member for extra food, clothes, vehicle, insurance (they become a dependent on their policy - car and health), etc. As long as the aforementioned "guest", over a 5 year period, isn't arrested for a felony (theft, rape, murder, etc.), then the sponsor will receive either a cash bonus, or a cut in their income tax (1% -3%) for the following 5 years. In the 5 year period, the aforementioned will be required to apply for US citizenship and take English as their primary language. The aforementioned will log in an appearance with the sponsor every week - like with a Probation Officer. The sponsor will be required to provide proof - in the form of a date-time stamped picture or video - of that visit to be turned over to the INS or HS monthly. To not do so, will be in violation and a fine will be levied. If the "guest" commits a crime, then the sponsor will serve the same sentence as the "guest" would have and in the same cell. If the sponsor loses track of his charge, then the sponsor will be incarcerated in a detention center and their citizenship will come up for review. If found neglecting, then the sponsor - with family - will be deported to the "guest's" country of origin - and losing their US citizenship forever. If there are no volunteers, then the gov't will start a mandatory sponsorship program, starting with Obama and Zuckerberg.