http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/21/supreme-court-ruling-on-police-powers-draws-scathing-dissents-from-justices.html
www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/21/supreme-court-ruling-on-police-powers-draws-scathing-dissents-from-justices.html
If the above link (s) don't work, copy and paste to a new browser window. That seems to get you there.
~~~~~~~~
As my friend Craig says...
1. Rights come as an endowment from our
creator.
2. Rights are inalienable and
cannot be abridged, without due process AND probable cause.
3. These rights, to self defense, and privacy are granted
in PART to the state BY the individual under the social
contract.
4. It is therefore IMPOSSIBLE for
the right granter, to have less rights, than the one to whom the party has
socially contracted.
5. As a recipient of
the right of another to act on their behalf, the standard for that action
because it is a limited license, is HIGHER than it is for the
individual.
In conclusion therefore, a
peace officer has no authority to randomly stop people whom he does not have any
probable cause to believe that an actual crime against persons or property has
occurred.
It is a wicked, immoral, and
tyrannical abuse of the limited powers granted him, to do so.
~~~~~~~
3 comments:
VERT DA FURK! I tried to look at the article mentioned and got this: ACCESS DENIED! You do not have permision to access this site on this terminal. Hmmmm, well this must be a hot potato then, eh?
FOX News self censorship or them pesky Federales blocking the truth?
Whoa! Me too... :(
Copy and paste the link to a new browser window and it seems to work.
Post a Comment