Yes, you are wrong. Flatly. Google is full of examples. If this link goes thru, it's titled "World's top Muslims condemn attacks on Iraqi Christians", and that's just one of hundreds that showed up on the most cursory Google search. http://www.romereports.com/pg157779-world-s-top-muslim-leaders-condemn-attacks-on-iraqi-christians-en
Another thing - the 90% of muslims that don't condone the 10% radicals are nothing more than enablers. When have you seen the "other 90% 'good' muslims" actually turn in or ostrasize any radical? They lie by omission. I may not have done it, but I won't actively turn in those who do. So, reap the rewards of "guilt by association" and suck it up. Like GWB said, "If you aren't with us, then you're against us." Can't have it both ways.
6 comments:
You are absolutely correct regarding the Kurds. Thank you for reminding me. :)
Yes, you are wrong. Flatly. Google is full of examples.
If this link goes thru, it's titled "World's top Muslims condemn attacks on Iraqi Christians", and that's just one of hundreds that showed up on the most cursory Google search.
http://www.romereports.com/pg157779-world-s-top-muslim-leaders-condemn-attacks-on-iraqi-christians-en
I still wouldn't eat those M&Ms...
Blue M&M's?! C'mon ...
Blue M&Ms represent the UN in that candy bowl.
Another thing - the 90% of muslims that don't condone the 10% radicals are nothing more than enablers. When have you seen the "other 90% 'good' muslims" actually turn in or ostrasize any radical? They lie by omission. I may not have done it, but I won't actively turn in those who do. So, reap the rewards of "guilt by association" and suck it up. Like GWB said, "If you aren't with us, then you're against us." Can't have it both ways.
Post a Comment