Verbatim Post
Al Qaeda Incapable Of New Mass-Casualty Attack, U.S.
Officials Say
By Mark Hosenball
WASHINGTON, April 27 (Reuters) - Al Qaeda's core
organization is likely incapable of carrying out another mass-casualty attack on
the scale of Sept. 11, 2001, U.S. intelligence and counter-terrorism officials
said on Friday.
U.S. government experts also believe that the likelihood
of an attack using chemical, biological, atomic or radiological weapons over the
next year was not high, said Robert Cardillo, deputy director of U.S. National
Intelligence.
Cardillo and other U.S. officials, who spoke on condition
of anonymity, described these assessments on a conference call with journalists
billed as an opportunity for government experts to voice their assessments of al
Qaeda's potency a year after the killing of Osama bin Laden in a U.S. commando
raid.
Cardillo said the al Qaeda "core" organization that bin Laden
created has suffered strategic setbacks due to the outbreak of "Arab Spring"
protests and rebellions in Islamic countries, which have not spread great
sympathy for al Qaeda's hardline and violent brand of Islam.
More
worrying to U.S. counter-terrorism officials and their allies abroad is the
possibility of home-grown extremists, or "lone wolves," who are radicalized over
the Internet or in small cells, but who also now are being given encouragement
by media outlets connected to al Qaeda and its affiliates.
While they
were unwilling to declare that al Qaeda was on the brink of "strategic defeat,"
the U.S. officials did say they believed the central organization founded by bin
Laden simply was not capable today of marshalling the kind of resources and
planning that went into the deadly suicide airplane hijackings of Sept. 11,
2001.
The officials said that the United States regards four al Qaeda
spinoffs or affiliates as still posing threats of greater or lesser degree to
U.S. interests.
Most deadly, the officials said, was Yemen-based al Qaeda
in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), which U.S. officials believe was behind
unsuccessful but imaginative attempts to attack continental U.S. targets over
the last 18 months using airplane-borne bombs stashed in a passenger's underwear
and in photocopier ink cartridges.
Al Qaeda in Iraq, which arose in the
wake of the 2003 U.S. invasion to oust Saddam Hussein, remains a potentially
lethal presence in that country and may be expanding its activities into
neighboring Syria, though officials did not indicate they believe it poses much
of a threat to U.S. interests outside that region.
U.S. officials said
they regarded al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), an affiliate based in
North Africa, as largely a criminal organization engaged in kidnapping
Westerners for ransom. But they said they were concerned such tactics could
evolve into more spectacular kidnappings intended to win publicity for militant
causes.
U.S. officials said that after a period in which their struggle
became a magnet for disillusioned Islamic youths in both the United States and
Europe, al Qaeda's Somali affiliate, al Shabaab, has seen a measurable falloff
in Western recruiting and support.
On balance, a counter-terrorism
official said, it was "clear we've made progress towards defeating al Qaeda the
organization," though elements of both the ideology and the organization
certainly remain, including "a number of active networks in the United Kingdom."
(Editing by Eric Beech)
Article here
Reread paragraph 5, re-posted below.:
"More
worrying to U.S. counter-terrorism officials and their allies abroad is the
possibility of home-grown extremists, or "lone wolves," who are radicalized over
the Internet or in small cells, but who also now are being given encouragement
by media outlets connected to al Qaeda and its affiliates."
Might this statement reasonably be interpreted to mean that anyone who has an opinion and expresses it "over the internet" could be considered a terrorist? How about a group of individuals that might get together to discuss common interests?
Let me modify paragraph 5 ever so slightly:
"More
worrying to U.S. counter-terrorism officials and their allies abroad is the
possibility of home-grown extremists, or "lone wolves," who are radicalized over
the Internet or in small cells."
See what I mean?
I think that if you aren't concerned, you should be. Just sayin'...
Big Sis and the .gov
need a bogeyman, ya know. Its what puts bread on their tables. It keeps them in power. It allows them to extend their control.
Whom will they decide are the new threat?
The list is long, but distinguished. :)
The ground work is being laid. The finishing touches are being implemented. I wonder who they'll target first?
Do you think you can stop it? LOL. Not happenin', friends. It now has a life of its own.
Stay safe.